The Aryan Protocols II
Defining the Aryan: From Nationalistic Fragment to Global Organism
“We are a nation in formation. We are not defined under the terms of the previous paradigm. No longer are we merely Germans. … We are no longer merely Italians. We are not Spanish or Croatian. We are not Mediterranean or Nordic. … We are Aryan, connected to each other, to our past, and to our future.”
I. The Three Caucasoid Groups
Three divisions of the Caucasoid race: whites, Ashkenazim (Jews), and Aryans.
Whites: the largest group; defined as slaves to power, living only in the present, lacking historical consciousness.
Ashkenazim: a subset of Jewry; possess a powerful cultural technology of group cohesion and superiority.
Aryans: the smallest and weakest group; whites who have shed weakness and division, acting collectively as an organism.
“In our eyes there exist only three divisions of that race the world knows broadly as 'white' or 'Caucasoid'. There are ourselves, who are the fewest and weakest currently. There are the Ashkenazim, who are a subset of what are called 'Jews' … And finally there are those who are greatest in number, those who have been wielded as a sword by these first two groups in their battles against each other. Lacking all culture, lacking all insight, lacking any ability to look into the future, and lacking any worthy label, these are today simply called by the blanket term 'white'.”
II. Whites: Character and Contradictions
Slaves to power: obey whatever authority holds power, regardless of self-interest.
No historical memory: live only in the present; unable to learn from past or plan for future.
Contradictory nature: conservatives claim concern for their people but marry outside; liberals reject biology except for their own children’s inherited traits.
Gullibility: believe in magic, supernatural, and charlatans; unable to understand cultural tools.
Violent and superstitious: historical witch-hunts cited as example of misapplied energy.
Unable to ascertain social or historical patterns; cannot construct logical frameworks or promote long-term interests.
“They are such natural lackeys and evolutionary cattle that the dogma and propaganda put forth by whomever holds power will be believed by them, regardless if it be truth or lies, and regardless of what their physical senses tell them.”
III. The Jew: Cultural Technology
Judaism described not as a religion but as a survival technology for group cohesion.
Not a single race: Jews are a “loose federation of ethnicities”; focus is on Ashkenazim who blend into European societies.
Core technology: act as an organism, not individuals; practice exclusion; in-group superiority; discourage intermarriage.
Torah and Talmud: presented as evolutionary tools refined over centuries to ensure group survival.
“God = Volk”: the text claims Jews understand “God” to mean “the Jewish people” — a concept whites fail to grasp.
Self-adjusting mechanism: Judaism allows for adaptation; setbacks are interpreted as failure to follow group laws.
“The Jew’s Torah contains many injunctions and tales illustrating these truths, but one of the best and most overlooked is found in the much-reworked story of Exodus. … [It is] a mythic description of one segment of a population physically separating itself from the greater population at large and receiving laws to keep this separation permanent for as long as possible. This is how all organic groups are formed.”
IV. The Spread of Jewish Technology
Culture as tool: like Clovis spear points, cultural techniques spread to competing groups.
Christianity as appropriation: described as an altered version of Jewish technology taken up by other ethnicities.
Judaism’s evolution: after Torah was translated (Septuagint), Jews developed Talmud to maintain advantage.
Aryan appropriation: Germans attempted to use Jewish tools but were destroyed before they could fully implement them.
All groups are forever in conflict; healthy groups devise tactics to be victorious.
“All segments of mankind are competing groups. A human group maintains technological advantage over competitors by not allowing them access to the technology in question or by assuring that competitors who might have the ability to replicate this technology are eliminated.”
V. Defining the Aryan
Not merely German or Italian: Aryans are those whites who transcend national divisions.
Group organism: an Aryan is defined by membership in the group, not individual characteristics.
Awareness: Aryans understand their past, their genius, and their difference from others.
Opposition to Ashkenazi worldview: rejects the Jewish model of exploitation and anthropocentrism.
Conversion of whites: due to small numbers, some whites must be converted to Aryan through cultural and social change.
“Aryans are those Caucasoids who refuse to put another people’s interests before their own. When whites gain awareness of reality and no longer wish to remain as part of the ignorant mass of slaves, yet feel for whatever reason that they do not wish to enter through conversion into the body of the Ashkenazim as so many opportunistic others have already done, they are on the path to becoming Aryan.”
VI. Aryans vs. Whites vs. Jews: A Comparison
Whites: individualistic, present-oriented, gullible; no survival strategy; easily exploited.
Jews (Ashkenazi): organismal, historical, adaptive; cultural technology of group superiority and exclusion.
Aryans: organismal, historical, culturally creative; learning from Jew while rejecting exploitative elements.
“The word 'Aryan' has the same meaning as the word Jew, Hindoo, or Chinese, in that it describes a totality. This is difficult to make clear to the non-comprehending, in light of what has been done to this word, unprecedented in history. We must simply know what it means among ourselves as we wage our private war.”
VII. The German Example
Germany under Aryan control: described as the “ultimate expression” of Aryan capability — efficiency, art, science, technology.
Russia as antithesis: presented as example of Jewish cultural technology applied destructively.
United States: predicted to fall similarly under Jewish dominance.
The word “Aryan” has the same meaning as “Jew,” “Hindoo,” or “Chinese” — it describes a totality.
“Germany, when controlled completely by the Aryan, was the ultimate expression of our capability for building a state, for following the laws of the universe and for unlocking its secrets. Our efficiency, our technological and artistic genius, our respect for the world around us, our strengthening of the body and mind, our unsurpassed scholarship, our deep understanding of the meanings behind the examples offered by history and our corresponding foresight into the future; in short, our accomplishments in every field of human endeavour was incredible.”
VIII. Philosophical and Cultural Differences
Jewish worldview: anthropocentric, exploitative, based on domination of nature and others.
Aryan worldview: holistic, connected to land, respect for nature and animals, harmony between classes.
Judaism needs opposition: described as requiring other cultures to contrast itself against; cannot exist alone.
Aryan self-sufficiency: can survive without Jews; the reverse is claimed to be impossible.
“The Jew cannot be a steward of the land and remain a Jew. To him, formed in exile from the soil, land is a commodity like anything else, something to buy and sell. It has no meaning for him beyond this, he cannot recognise it as the source of life.”
IX. The Path Forward
Aryan as “nation in formation”: not defined by old national borders (German, Italian, etc.) but by shared identity and struggle.
Hidden agenda: like Jews in diaspora, Aryans must conceal true identity and work from within.
Long-term goal: transform environment to allow Aryan survival and eventual flourishing.
Aryans are slaves, but cognizant slaves — differing from others enslaved alongside them. establishes the tripartite division of Caucasoid peoples into whites, Ashkenazim, and Aryans. Whites are described as slaves to power, living only in the present, lacking historical consciousness, and unable to act collectively — making them natural prey for exploitation. The Ashkenazim (a subset of Jewry) are presented as possessing a powerful cultural technology of group cohesion, exclusion, and superiority, which has enabled their evolutionary success. The Aryan is defined as the white who has shed weakness and division, learning to act as an organism rather than as individuals. The protocol argues that culture is a tool that can be stolen and used by competing groups, and that the Jew's Torah and Talmud are such tools — refined over centuries for group survival. The Aryan's task is to understand and appropriate these tools while rejecting the Jew's exploitative and unsustainable worldview. The protocol concludes that the Aryan is a "nation in formation," no longer defined by old national borders but by a shared identity and struggle.
“We are slaves, yes. But we are cognisant slaves. In that respect we differ from others who are currently enslaved alongside us. We differ from them in many ways. We are not swayed by fashionable ideas or fashionable proclivities. We are not creatures of the eternal present, like frogs or dogs or whites, with no past to draw on. The memory of our stolen past burns inside us. It is fuel for life, and we are alive.”